ARTICLES ON HAWAIIAN AND PACIFIC BIRDS, BIRDWATCHING AND WILDLIFE



A New Approach - Taxonomic re-arrangement of the World's Albatrosses



Since 1983, when Amsterdam Albatross was described, the taxonomic arrangement of the World's Albatrosses has remain unchanged, with recent treatments recognising 14 species in two different genera, the two Sooty Albatrosses phoebetria and all remaining species diomedia. However recent work has shown that there is historical uncertainty as to the relationships within the albatross family Diomedeidae, with more than twelve new generic arrangements being proposed in the last century. The latest research has recommended that albatross taxonomy be reassessed at genus and species level. A multinational team headed by Gary Nunn in 1996 provided evidence that the two genus arrangement used traditionally does not reflect the evolutionary relationships of the albatrosses (Auk 113: 784-801).

By using cytochrome-b gene sequencing Nunn established that early in albatross evolution two separate lineages occurred, which later divided to form four distinct groups: the southern mollymawks, the sooty albatrosses, the North Pacific albatrosses and the "great" albatrosses. The resurrection of two genera Thalassarche (for the southern mollymawks) and phoebastria (for North Pacific species) was suggested so that the monophyl of these groups could be recognised properly.

In September 1995 the First International Conference on the Biology and Conservation of Albatrosses was held in Hobart, Australia and Nunn and Robertson presented their findings, as well as going beyond, and suggesting a revised species-level taxonomy of the albatrosses within the new four genus arrangement. After much discussion the proposals were accepted, although not fully implemented. The revision suggests the recognition of all current sub-species as full species, the foundation of which is that there are genetic differences between taxa which parallel differences in morphology, although the former has yet to be published. King (1998) says that "from a biological viewpoint, it is easy to imagine that gene flow between "subspecies" is extremely low, given that breeding albatrosses have extremely high fidelity to their natal areas which are invariably isolated oceanic archipelagos. Although this recent work makes suggestions for further splits resulting in species status for each of the 24 known taxa, it should be noted here that calculations of distance matrices by Michael Wink and John Penhallurick using Nunn's cytochrome b sequence data indicate that none of the proposed splits are supported (Silcock 2002). Finally, while the authors (Nunn et al.) acknowledge that further research is required to validate the proposed taxonomy, clearly the new arrangement has major conservation implications given the threatened status and restricted breeding distributions of many albatross taxa.



CURRENT ENGLISH NAME

CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAME

 

PROPOSED ENGLISH NAME

PROPOSED SCIENTIFIC NAME

         
Wandering Albatross Diomedia exulans exulans   Wandering Albatross Diomedia exulans
  Diomedia exulans dabbenena   Tristan Albatross Diomedia dabbenena
  Diomedia exulans antipodensis   Antipodean Albatross Diomedia antipodensis
  Diomedia exulans gibsoni   Gibson's Albatross Diomedia gibsoni
Royal Albatross Diomedia epomophora sanfordi   Northern Royal Albatross Diomedia sanfordi
  Diomedia epomophora epomophora   Southern Royal Albatross Diomedia epomophora
Amsterdam Albatross Diomedia amsterdamensis   Amsterdam Albatross Diomedia amsterdamensis
Short-tailed Albatross Diomedia albatrus   Short-tailed Albatross Phoebastria albatrus
Waved Albatross Diomedia irrorata   Waved Albatross Phoebastria irrorata
Laysan Albatross Diomedia immutabilis   Laysan Albatross Phoebastria immutabilis
Black-footed Albatross Diomedia nigripes   Black-footed Albatross Phoebastria nigripes
Black-browed Albatross Diomedia melanophrys melanophrys   Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophrys
  Diomedia melanophrys impavida   Campbell Albatross Thalassarche impavida
Buller's Albatross Diomedia bulleri bulleri   Buller's Albatross Thalassarche bulleri
  Diomedia bulleri platei   Pacific Albatross Thalassarche platei
Shy Albatross Diomedia cauta cauta   Shy Albatross Thalassarche cauta
 

"New Form"

  White-capped Albatross* Thalassarche steadi
  Diomedia cauta salvini   Salvin's Albatross Thalassarche salvini
  Diomedia cauta eremita   Chatham Albatross Thalassarche eremita
Yellow-nosed Albatross Diomedia chlororhynchos chlororhynchos   Atlantic Yellow-nosed Albatross Thalassarche chlororhynchos
  Diomedia chlororhynchos bassi   Indian Yellow-nosed Albatross Thalassarche bassi
Grey-headed Albatross Diomedia chrysostoma   Grey-headed Albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma
Sooty Albatross Phoebetria fusca   Sooty Albatross Phoebetria fusca
Light-mantled Sooty Albatross Phoebetria palpebrata   Light-mantled Sooty Albatross Phoebetria palpebrata
* Note that T.c.steadi is not recognised by all authorities.

Shy Albatross (Thalassarche cauta) off California, 1999. Photograph © by Luke Cole

Albatross Taxonomy

Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences (Nunn et al. 1996. Auk 113: 784–801; Nunn & Stanley 1998. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1360–1371) indicate that the albatrosses comprise four major monophyletic groups, which are best recognized as genera: the North Pacific albatrosses (Phoebastria, comprising P. immutabilis, P. nigripes, P. irrorata and P. albatrus), the great albatrosses (Diomedea, comprising D. epomophora, D. exulans and D. amsterdamensis), the mollymawks (Thalassarche, comprising T. chlororhynchos, T. bulleri, T. cauta, T. chrysostoma and T. melanophris), and the sooty albatrosses (Phoebetria, comprising P. fusca and P. palpebrata). The same studies indicate that the sooty albatrosses are the sister-group of the molly-mawks rather than the sister-group to all remaining albatrosses and that the genus Diomedea, as traditionally defined, is not monophyletic. The recognition of the genera Phoebastria and Thalassarche is recommended because this underscores the existence of four major groups of albatrosses and eliminates paraphyly of the traditional genus Diomedea.

References:


BRETAGNOLLE, V. and THOMAS, T. 1990. Seabird distribution between Tasmania and Adelie Land (Antarctica), and comparison with nearby Antarctic sectors. Emu 90:97 - 107.

BROTHERS, N.P.1979. Seabird Islands: Mewstone, Tasmania. Corella 3: 68-69.

BROTHERS, N.P., REID, T., and GALES, R.P. 1997. At-sea distribution of Shy Albatross Diomedia cauta cauta derived from records of band recoveries and colour-marked birds. Emu 97: 231-239.

BROTHERS, N.P., GALES, R., HEDD,A. and ROBERTSON, G. 1998. Foraging movements of the Shy albatross Diomedia cauta breeding in Australia; implications for interactions with longline fisheries. Ibis 140: 446-457.

COLE, L.W. 2000. A first Shy Albatross, Thalassarche cauta, in California and a critical re-examination of Northern Hemisphere records of the former Diomedia cauta complex. North American Birds, volume 54: No.2. ABA. Colorado Springs, U.S.A.

CROXALL, J.P. and GALES, R. 1998. An assessment of the conservation status of Albatrosses. Pp. 45-46, in Robertson, G. and R. Gales, eds. Albatross Biology and Conservation. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia.

del HOYO, J., ELLIOTT, A. and SARGATEL, J. eds. 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

HARPER, P.C. and KINSKY, F.C. 1978. Southern Albatrosses and Petrels: an identification guide. Wellington.

HARRISON, P. 1985. Seabirds: An Identification Guide. Croom-Helm, London.

HARRISON, P.1987a. A Fieldguide to the seabirds of the World. Helm, London.

HARRISON, P.1987b. Seabirds of the World: a photographic guide. Christopher Helm, London.

HARROP, S. 1994. Albatross in the Western Palearctic. Birding World 7:241-245.

KING, J. 1998. New Approach to Albatrosses in Birding World 12:1, p.2. Norfolk, UK.

MARCHANT, S.M. and HIGGINS, P.J. 1990. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, Volume 1A. OUP, Oxford, UK.

NUNN, G.B., COOPER, J., JOUVENTIN, P. ROBERTSON, C.J.R. and ROBERTSON, G.G. 1996. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeae) established from complete cytochrome-b gene sequences. Auk 113: 784-801.

SHIRIHAI, H. 1996. The Birds of Israel. Academic Press, London.

SILCOCK, R. 2001. Diomedeidae taxonomy on the following website: <<http://users.connections.net/silcock/2.htm>>. Australia.

TICKELL, W.L.N. 1995. Atlas of Southern Hemisphere Albatrosses. Privately published.

TICKELL, W.L.N. 2000. Albatrosses. Pica Press, UK.

TROUNSON, D. and TROUNSON, M. 1989. Australian Birds, 2nd ed. PR Books, Frenchs Forest, Australia.


Christian Melgar, Worthing, West Sussex. 2003.



Back to Top of Page


©Birding Hawaii 2003